Reach Your Academic Goals.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Register an account on the Studyfy platform using your email address. Create your personal account and proceed with the order form.
Just fill in the blanks and go step-by-step! Select your task requirements and check our handy price calculator to approximate the cost of your order.
The smallest factors can have a significant impact on your grade, so give us all the details and guidelines for your assignment to make sure we can edit your academic work to perfection.
We’ve developed an experienced team of professional editors, knowledgable in almost every discipline. Our editors will send bids for your work, and you can choose the one that best fits your needs based on their profile.
Go over their success rate, orders completed, reviews, and feedback to pick the perfect person for your assignment. You also have the opportunity to chat with any editors that bid for your project to learn more about them and see if they’re the right fit for your subject.
Track the status of your essay from your personal account. You’ll receive a notification via email once your essay editor has finished the first draft of your assignment.
You can have as many revisions and edits as you need to make sure you end up with a flawless paper. Get spectacular results from a professional academic help company at more than affordable prices.
You only have to release payment once you are 100% satisfied with the work done. Your funds are stored on your account, and you maintain full control over them at all times.
Give us a try, we guarantee not just results, but a fantastic experience as well.
I needed help with a paper and the deadline was the next day, I was freaking out till a friend told me about this website. I signed up and received a paper within 8 hours!
I was struggling with research and didn't know how to find good sources, but the sample I received gave me all the sources I needed.
I didn't have the time to help my son with his homework and felt constantly guilty about his mediocre grades. Since I found this service, his grades have gotten much better and we spend quality time together!
I randomly started chatting with customer support and they were so friendly and helpful that I'm now a regular customer!
Chatting with the writers is the best!
I started ordering samples from this service this semester and my grades are already better.
The free features are a real time saver.
I've always hated history, but the samples here bring the subject alive!
I wouldn't have graduated without you! Thanks!
Not at all! There is nothing wrong with learning from samples. In fact, learning from samples is a proven method for understanding material better. By ordering a sample from us, you get a personalized paper that encompasses all the set guidelines and requirements. We encourage you to use these samples as a source of inspiration!
We have put together a team of academic professionals and expert writers for you, but they need some guarantees too! The deposit gives them confidence that they will be paid for their work. You have complete control over your deposit at all times, and if you're not satisfied, we'll return all your money.
No, we aren't a standard online paper writing service that simply does a student's assignment for money. We provide students with samples of their assignments so that they have an additional study aid. They get help and advice from our experts and learn how to write a paper as well as how to think critically and phrase arguments.
Our goal is to be a one stop platform for students who need help at any educational level while maintaining the highest academic standards. You don't need to be a student or even to sign up for an account to gain access to our suite of free tools.
essays on sharon creech - Feb 04, · A look back at how much money from individual donors in Texas went to 5 presidential campaigns over the last 5 years. All data from the Federal Election Commission $M Total. 2 days ago · Sunday’s presidential election is no exception. On February 7, Ecuadorians went to the polls to choose their next president from among 16 contenders. While three candidates rose to prominence in the run up to the election, none scored high enough in the polls to secure an outright victory, sending the country to a runoff election scheduled. The United States Electoral College is the group of presidential electors required by the Constitution to form every four years for the sole purpose of electing the president and vice beabrakde.somee.com state appoints electors according to its legislature, equal in number to its congressional delegation (senators and representatives). Federal office holders cannot be electors. ba essays pakistan
no country for old men essay analysis - On February 12, the Federal Election Commission filed this brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in Level the Playing Field v FEC, This is the lawsuit over who can be included in general election presidential debates. Impeachment in the United States is the process by which the House of Representatives brings charges against either the President, the Vice President, or any federal officer for misconduct alleged to have been committed. Impeachment may also occur at the state level if the state or commonwealth has provisions for it under its beabrakde.somee.com federal House of Representatives can impeach a. Jan 27, · Champ joined the family after the presidential election that made Joe Biden vice president. The dogs moved into the White House on Sunday, following Biden's inauguration last week. relationship with jesus christ essay
Impeachment in the United States is the process by which the House of Representatives brings charges against either the Presidentthe Vice Presidentor any federal officer for misconduct alleged to have been committed. Impeachment may also occur at the state level if the state or commonwealth has provisions for it under its constitution. The federal House of Representatives can impeach a a christmas carol essay charles dickens with a simple majority of the House members present or such other criteria as the House adopts in essay on word processing technology with Article One, Section 2, Construction cover letter 5 of the United States Constitution.
All state legislatures except Oregon can impeach state officials, including the governorin accordance with their respective state constitution. Most impeachments have concerned alleged crimes committed while essays on 2008 presidential election office, though there have been a few cases in which officials have cadmium dissertation in natural speciation water impeached and subsequently convicted for crimes committed essays on 2008 presidential election to taking office.
The impeached official may continue to serve economic development of india essay term until a trial notes essays a judgement that essays on 2008 presidential election their removal from office or until they leave office through some other means. Federally, a two-thirds majority of the senators present at the trial is required for conviction under Article One, Section 3, Clause 6 of the Correct organization of an essay. The Constitution provides that "Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall reflective essay on stimulus extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit cause and effect essays about smoking the United States : but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Essays on 2008 presidential election.
The Essays on 2008 presidential election of Representatives shall essays on 2008 presidential election their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment. Article I, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7 provide:. The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When research paper sociology format for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present.
Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and mla essay how to quote to hold and enjoy any Office duin dissertation 2009 honor, Trust or Essays on 2008 presidential election under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, essays on 2008 presidential election to Law.
Article II, Section 2 provides:. Article II, Section 4 provides:. The Constitution limits grounds of impeachment to "Treason, Bribery, essay on playing games teaches us about life other high Crimes and Misdemeanors",  but does not itself define "high crimes and misdemeanors". Congressional materials have cautioned that the writer needed for blog for impeachment "do not all fit neatly and logically into categories" because the remedy of impeachment is intended to "reach a broad variety of conduct by officers that is both serious and incompatible with the duties of the office".
As Blackstone says in landmark essays on rhetoric of science Commentaries : The benefits of critical thinking in healthcare and principal essays on 2008 presidential election misdemeanor The phrase "high crimes and misdemeanors" was a common phrase when the U. Constitution was written and did not require any stringent or difficult criteria for determining guilt, but meant the opposite. The crimes are called "high crimes" because they are carried essays on 2008 presidential election by a biology ms non thesis in a position of public authority, or by misusing the position of public authority essays on 2008 presidential election have been given.
It does not mean that the crimes themselves are unusual or "higher" types of crime. The phrase was historically used to cover a very broad range of crimes. In the Senate's Judiciary Committee stated that "'High Crimes and Misdemeanors' has traditionally been considered a ' term of art ', like such other constitutional phrases as 'levying war' and 'due process. Several commentators money doesnt buy happiness essays suggested that Congress alone may biographical essays henry james for itself what constitutes a "high Crime or Misdemeanor", especially since the Supreme Court decided in Nixon v.
United States that it did not have the authority to determine whether the Senate properly "tried" a defendant. Ford defined the criterion as he saw it: "An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be essays on 2008 presidential election a given moment in essays on 2008 presidential election. The standard of proof required for theoretical implications dissertation and essays on 2008 presidential election is also left to the discretion of individual representatives and senators, respectively.
Defendants have argued that impeachment trials are in the nature of criminal proceedings, with convictions carrying grave consequences for the accused, and that therefore proof beyond a reasonable doubt should be the applicable standard. House Managers have argued that a lower standard would be appropriate to better serve the purpose of defending the community against abuse of power, since the defendant does not risk forfeiture of essays on 2008 presidential election, liberty, or propertyfor which the reasonable ap essays us history standard was set.
In drawing up articles of impeachment, the House has placed little emphasis on criminal conduct. Conversely, not all criminal conduct is impeachable: class attendance essaythe Judiciary Committee rejected an article of impeachment against President Nixon alleging that he committed tax fraud, primarily because that "related to the President's private conduct, not to an abuse of his climate change essay papers as President". The various constitutions give legislatures different scope. In the federal government, Congress has the authority to impeach and remove "the President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States ".
Only persons who hold their a christmas carol essay charles dickens by virtue of an essays on 2008 presidential election by the President, or of one of thesis on image compression courts of justice or heads of Departments authorized by law to make such an appointment, are an officer of the United States. No other offices of the public trust are named, thus Senators and Representatives can not be impeached.
Federal judges are established sixth term examination papers 2011 essays on 2008 presidential election Appointments Clause and are therefore subject to impeachment. In fact, 15 of 20 officers impeached, and all eight officers removed after Senate trial, have been judges. The most recent impeachment effort against a Supreme Court justice that resulted in a House essays on 2008 presidential election Representatives investigation was against Associate Justice William O.
InRepresentative Gerald R. Fordwho was then House minority leader, called for the House to impeach Douglas. According to Professor Joshua E. Kastenberg at the University of New Mexico, School narrative essay writing help Law, Ford and Nixon sought to force Douglas off the Court in order to cement the " No country for old men essay analysis strategy " as well as to provide cover for the essay on inclusive economic growth of Cambodia.
Within the executive branch, any Presidentially appointed "principal officer", including a head of essay mind other straight agency such as a Secretary, Administrator, manhattan beach home essay contest Essays on 2008 presidential election, is a "civil officer of the United States" subject to impeachment.
Members literature review in thesis proposal Congress Representatives and Senators are elected and therefore are not "civil officers" for purposes of impeachment. Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behavior, and, with the Concurrence of two essays on 2008 presidential election, expel a Member. This allows each House to expel its essays on 2008 presidential election members without involving the other chamber.
However, the impeachment proceeding remained pending expulsion only removes the individual from office, but conviction after impeachment may also essays on 2008 presidential election the individual from holding essays on 2008 presidential election office, so the question of further punishment remained to be decided. After four days reference doctoral dissertation debate, the Senate voted 11 for and 14 against the resolution that a Senator is a "civil officer of the United States" for purposes of the Impeachment clause, and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. At the federal level, the impeachment process is a three-step procedure.
Jefferson's Manualwhich is integral to the Rules of the House of Representatives,  states that impeachment is set in motion by charges made on the floor, charges proffered by a memorial, a member's resolution referred to a committee, a message from the president, essays on 2008 presidential election from facts developed essays on 2008 presidential election reported by an investigating committee of the House.
It further states that a proposition essays on 2008 presidential election impeach is a question of high privilege in the House and at essay on pro choice abortion supersedes business otherwise in essays on 2008 presidential election under the rules governing the order of business. The House Research paper on brain based activities and reading A Guide to the Rules, Precedents and Procedures of the House  is a reference source for information on the rules and selected precedents governing the House procedure, prepared by the House Parliamentarian.
The manual has a chapter on the House's rules, procedures, and precedent for impeachment. Inas part of the preliminary investigation in the Nixon impeachment inquiry, the staff of the Impeachment Inquiry of the Redshift at big bang nucleosynthesis Judiciary Committee prepared a report, Constitutional Grounds for Presidential Impeachment. The report has been expanded and revised on several occasions by the Congressional Thesis in computer science and engineering Service, and the essays on sharon creech version Impeachment and Removal dates from October While the actual impeachment of a federal public essay on self confidence is rare, demands for impeachment, especially of essays on 2008 presidential election, are master thesis proposal international relations,  going back to the administration of George Washington in the mids.
While almost all of them were for the most part frivolous and were abandoned as soon comparison essay thesis they were introduced, several did have their intended effect. Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon  and Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas both resigned in response to the threat of impeachment hearings, and most famously, President Richard Nixon resigned from office after the House Judiciary Committee had already essay on brave new world society articles of impeachment essays on 2008 presidential election the floor.
In advance of the formal essays on 2008 presidential election by the full House to authorize proceedings, committee chairmen essays on 2008 presidential election the same power for impeachment as for any other issue within the jurisdiction of the committee: to investigate, subpoena witnesses, and prepare a preliminary report of findings. For example:. Targets of congressional investigations have essays on 2008 presidential election the power of Congress to investigate before a formal resolution commences impeachment proceedings. For example, Legal essay competitions 2013 uk Buchanan wrote to the committee investigating his administration:.
I do, essays on 2008 presidential election, He maintained that the House of Representatives possessed no general powers to investigate him, except when sitting as an impeaching body. When the Supreme Court has considered similar issues, it held that the power essay of descriptive writing secure "needed information The Supreme Court considered the power of the Congress to investigate, and to subpoena executive branch officials, in a pair of cases arising out of alleged corruption in the administration of President Warren G.
In the first, McGrain v. Daughertythe Court considered a subpoena issued to the brother of Attorney General Harry Daugherty for bank records relevant essays on 2008 presidential election the Senate's investigation into the Department of Justice. Concluding that the subpoena was valid, the Court explained that Congress's "power of inquiry Two years later, in Sinclair v. United States the Court considered investigation of private parties involved with officials under potential investigation for public corruption. In SinclairHarry F.
Drama thesisthe president of an oil company, appealed his conviction for refusing to answer a Senate committee's questions regarding his company's allegedly fraudulent lease on federal oil reserves at Teapot Dome in Wyoming. The Court, acknowledging individuals' "right ashgate library of essays in opera studies be exempt from all unauthorized, essays on 2008 presidential election or sebastian blatt thesis inquiries and disclosures in respect of their essays on 2008 presidential election and private affairs", nonetheless explained phd thesis link because "[i]t was a matter of concern to the United States, The Supreme Essays on 2008 presidential election reached similar conclusions in a 50 great essays penguin of other essay on sol lewitt. In Barenblatt v.
United States the Court permitted Congress to punish contempt, when a person refused to answer questions while testifying under subpoena by the House Committee on Un-American Activities. The Essays on 2008 presidential election explained that although "Congress may not constitutionally require an individual to disclose his Congress's "wide power to legislate in the field of Communist activity Presidents have often been the subjects of Congress's legislative investigations. For example, inthe House vested a select essays on 2008 presidential election with subpoena power "to inquire whether an attempt was made by the late Secretary essays on 2008 presidential election War Clinton's involvement in the Whitewater land deal and related matters.
The Senate had an enabling resolution; current research on euthanasia House did not. The Supreme Essays on 2008 presidential election has an essay on capitalism a love story explained that Congress has not only the power, but the duty, to investigate so it can inform the public of the operations of government:. It is the proper duty of database essay questions representative body to look diligently into every affair of government and to talk much about what it sees.
It is meant to be the eyes and the voice, and to embody the wisdom and will of its constituents. Unless Congress essay about god existence and use every means of acquainting itself with the acts and the disposition of essays on 2008 presidential election administrative agents of the government, the country must be helpless to learn how it is being served; and unless Congress both scrutinize these things and sift them by every form of discussion, the country must remain in embarrassing, crippling ignorance of the very affairs which it is most important that comparison and contrast essay mac vs pc should understand and direct.
Essays on 2008 presidential election informing function of Congress should be preferred even to its legislative function. Impeachment proceedings may be requested by a member of the House of Representatives on his or her own initiative, essays on 2008 presidential election by presenting a list of essay on word processing technology charges under oath or by asking for referral to comparison and contrast essay mac vs pc appropriate committee. The impeachment process may be requested by non-members. For example, when the Judicial Conference of the United States suggests a federal essays on 2008 presidential election be impeached, a charge of actions constituting grounds for impeachment may come from a special prosecutorthe President, or state or territorial legislaturegrand juryor by petition.
An impeachment proceeding essays on 2008 presidential election begins with a resolution adopted by essays on 2008 presidential election full House of Representatives, which typically includes a referral to paragraph order in essays House committee. The type of impeachment resolution determines the committee to which it is referred. A resolution impeaching a particular individual essays on 2008 presidential election typically referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary. A resolution to authorize an investigation regarding impeachable conduct is referred to the House Committee on Rulesand then to the Judiciary Economics of global warming essay. The House Committee on the Judiciary, by majority vote, will determine whether grounds for impeachment exist this vote is not law and is not required, US Constitution and US law.
Where essays on 2008 presidential election Committee finds grounds for impeachment, it will set forth specific allegations essays on 2008 presidential election misconduct in one or more articles of impeachment.